top of page

NOTES

Structuralism is a theoretical paradigm that emerged primarily in the fields of anthropology, linguistics, and literary theory in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It emphasizes the idea that the elements of human culture must be understood in terms of their relationship to a larger, overarching system or structure. Here are the main tenets of structuralism:

  1. Structures Over Individuals: Structuralism posits that meaningful systems are more important than individual elements within those systems. It focuses on the underlying structure that gives shape to a culture, a text, or a human mind rather than individual instances or actions.

  2. Binary Oppositions: Structuralism often identifies meaning in terms of binary contrasts (oppositions like hot/cold, male/female, raw/cooked, etc.). These binary oppositions are thought to reflect fundamental categories that structure human thought.

  3. Universality of Structures: One of the key claims of structuralism is that structures are universal, and similar structures can be found across different cultures and times. This claim is based on the notion that human brains are fundamentally similar and thus create similar structures.

  4. Synchronic Analysis: Structuralism is more concerned with examining systems at a single point in time (a synchronic approach) rather than tracing their historical development (a diachronic approach).

  5. The Arbitrary Nature of Signs: Building on Ferdinand de Saussure’s semiotics, structuralism holds that the relationship between a sign (a word, for example) and its meaning is arbitrary and is determined by the system of signs it is a part of, rather than any inherent relationship between the word and its meaning.

  6. Interrelated Systems: Structuralists believe that various systems of a culture, such as its myths, art, norms, and language, are interrelated and work together to form a larger cohesive system or structure.

  7. Methodology of Analysis: Structuralism involves a method of analysis that seeks to understand a system by breaking it down into its smallest units and then understanding how these units fit together. For example, in structuralist literary criticism, a text is broken down into smaller units (like motifs or themes) to reveal the underlying structure.

  8. Denial of Human Agency: In structuralist theory, individual human agency is often de-emphasized. Instead, structuralism posits that people's behavior and perceptions are shaped by the underlying structures in which they exist.

  9. Influence of Language on Culture: Structuralism places significant emphasis on the role of language as the structure that most significantly influences and organizes human thought and culture.

  10. Scientific Approach to Humanities: Structuralism often seeks to apply methods similar to those of the natural sciences to the analysis of human culture, aiming for objectivity and the discovery of general principles.

While structuralism was hugely influential, it has also been critiqued and largely supplanted by post-structuralism and other theoretical paradigms that challenge many of structuralism’s basic assumptions. Nonetheless, structuralism remains a key concept in the history of anthropological, linguistic, and literary theory.

Post-structuralism is a diverse set of intellectual developments that emerged in the mid-20th century, largely in response to or in dialogue with structuralism. Post-structuralism is not a unified movement or theory, but rather a general designation for various critiques and departures from structuralism. Here are some of the main tenets and themes commonly associated with post-structuralism:

  1. Critique of Binary Oppositions: Post-structuralists challenge the structuralist reliance on binary oppositions, arguing that this simplifies complex relationships and hierarchies within texts and cultures. They strive to deconstruct these oppositions and expose their underlying assumptions and contradictions.

  2. Instability of Meaning: Post-structuralism posits that meaning is not fixed or stable but is instead constantly in flux. This challenges the structuralist notion of a stable relationship between signifiers and signifieds.

  3. Deconstruction: This is a strategy developed by Jacques Derrida that involves the careful teasing out of warring forces of signification within a text. Deconstruction aims to show the inherent contradictions and instability of meaning within texts.

  4. Critique of the Author/Authorial Intent: Post-structuralists often reject the notion that the meaning of a text is determined by the author’s intent. Roland Barthes famously declared "the death of the author," arguing that the interpretation of a text is created in the act of reading, not in the act of writing.

  5. Textual Interplay and Intertextuality: Post-structuralists like Julia Kristeva emphasize that texts are not isolated entities but are part of a web of other texts. Meaning is thus produced through the interplay of texts (intertextuality) rather than being inherent in any single text.

  6. Power and Discourse: Inspired by Michel Foucault, post-structuralism often analyzes the ways in which language and discourse are tied to power. This involves examining how different forms of knowledge and truth are constructed by those in power and are used to manage and control populations.

  7. Resistance to Meta-Narratives: Post-structuralists, like Jean-François Lyotard, are skeptical of large, overarching theories or narratives (meta-narratives) that claim to explain and organize all human experience and history.

  8. Subjectivity and Identity as Constructed and Fragmented: Post-structuralism often focuses on the ways in which subjectivity and identity are constructed through language and culture, challenging the notion of a unified, coherent self. This has been influential in gender studies, queer theory, and post-colonial studies.

  9. Language as Material and Performative: Rather than seeing language as a transparent medium that conveys meaning, post-structuralists view language as a material and often performative act that produces effects in the world.

  10. Critical and Reflexive Approach: Post-structuralists are often self-reflexive about their own practices and skeptical of the claims to objectivity and neutrality in various forms of knowledge and inquiry.

It is important to note that post-structuralism is a broad and diverse field, and not all post-structuralist thinkers would necessarily subscribe to all of these tenets. Additionally, post-structuralism is often more of a critique or deconstruction of traditional philosophical and theoretical ideas rather than a cohesive theory or method in itself.

Decolonialization theory, or decolonial theory, is an intellectual movement that seeks to understand, resist, and challenge colonialism and its legacy. It centers the perspectives, experiences, and knowledge systems of colonized peoples, both during the period of colonization and in the contemporary post-colonial era. Decolonial theory is grounded in a recognition of the ongoing impact of colonialism on cultures, societies, and individuals around the world, and it seeks to envision and enact forms of knowledge, action, and existence that are not defined by Western colonial paradigms. Here are some of the main tenets and themes associated with decolonialization theory:

  1. Centrality of Colonialism: Decolonial theory posits that colonialism is not just a historical event but a set of enduring structures that continue to shape the world in profound ways, including economically, politically, socially, and culturally.

  2. Critique of Western Epistemology: Decolonial theorists critique Western forms of knowledge as being not universal but tied to specific, colonial histories and power structures. They challenge the assumption that Western science, philosophy, and humanities are the most advanced or legitimate ways of knowing.

  3. Recovery and Legitimization of Indigenous Knowledge: Decolonial theory emphasizes the value and importance of indigenous knowledge systems, and it seeks to recover and legitimize these ways of knowing that have been marginalized or erased by colonialism.

  4. Critique of Modernity: Decolonial theorists often argue that modernity itself is deeply entwined with colonialism. In this view, the European project of modernity was built on the colonization and exploitation of the non-European world.

  5. Intersectional Analysis: Decolonial theory is often intersectional, considering how colonization intersects with other forms of domination and oppression, such as racism, patriarchy, and economic exploitation.

  6. Emphasis on Resistance and Agency: Decolonial theory centers the resistance of colonized peoples, highlighting not only the ways they have been acted upon by colonial powers but also the ways they have acted for themselves, resisted, and created alternative forms of life and knowledge.

  7. De-linking and De-centering: A key concept in decolonial theory is the idea of 'de-linking'—that is, disconnecting from Western-centric systems of knowledge, being, and power. This involves de-centering Western perspectives and opening up space for other ways of knowing and being.

  8. Commitment to Social Justice and Liberation: Decolonial theory is not just an intellectual exercise; it is deeply connected to political projects of social justice and liberation. It is often used to critique and challenge contemporary forms of power and exploitation and to envision more just and equitable alternatives.

  9. Global Perspective: While it is grounded in the experiences of specific communities and regions, decolonial theory also offers a critique of global systems of power and a vision of global justice. It is often in dialogue with post-colonial studies, though the two are distinct in several key ways.

  10. Re-imagination and Re-creation of Culture and Society: Decolonial theory is also about the positive project of reimagining and recreating cultures and societies along lines that are not determined by Western and colonial paradigms. It is as much about creation as it is about critique.

It is important to note that decolonial theory is diverse and multifaceted, encompassing a wide range of scholars, activists, and communities with varying perspectives and emphases.

In decolonial theory, "de-linking" and "de-centering" refer to processes of disconnecting from Western-centric systems of knowledge, power, and being, and shifting the focus away from Western or Eurocentric perspectives. This involves both a critical examination of the assumptions and structures of Western thought and an active engagement with alternative ways of thinking, knowing, and living. Here are some strategies and approaches for de-linking and de-centering within the context of decolonial theory:

  1. Question Western Norms and Assumptions: Begin by critically examining the assumptions and norms that underlie Western knowledge systems. Question the universality of Western theories and concepts, and recognize them as one way of knowing among many.

  2. Engage with Non-Western Knowledge Systems: Actively seek out and engage with intellectual traditions, philosophies, and ways of knowing from non-Western cultures. This can include indigenous knowledge systems, Eastern philosophies, African philosophies, etc.

  3. Amplify Marginalized Voices: Prioritize and center the perspectives, experiences, and voices of those who have been marginalized or silenced by colonial and Western-centric narratives. This can involve reading authors from the Global South, listening to indigenous voices, and engaging with grassroots movements.

  4. Reflect on Positionality: Constantly be aware of and reflect on your own positionality—your unique social and historical position and how it shapes your perspective. Consider how your own thinking might be influenced by colonial and Western-centric ideas.

  5. Revise Curricula and Reading Lists: If you are in an educational context (as a student, teacher, or researcher), advocate for curricula that are not Eurocentric. This can involve reading authors who are not from the Western canon, studying non-Western art and culture, etc.

  6. Practice Epistemic Disobedience: This term, coined by Walter Mignolo, refers to the active refusal to accept Western epistemology as the sole or primary way of knowing. It involves consciously and deliberately engaging with and validating other ways of knowing.

  7. Engage in Collaborative and Humble Learning: Approach other cultures and knowledge systems with humility and a genuine desire to learn, rather than a desire to validate your own pre-existing beliefs or to exoticize the other.

  8. Critique Contemporary Forms of Coloniality: Actively critique and challenge contemporary forms of colonialism and Western dominance in the world today, including in economic, cultural, and political spheres.

  9. Support Decolonial Movements: Engage with and support social and political movements that are working toward decolonial goals, whether these are indigenous rights movements, anti-racist movements, or others.

  10. Reimagine and Rebuild: Decolonial work is not just about critique; it is also about the positive project of imagining and building alternatives. Engage in creative, constructive efforts to envision and enact more just and equitable forms of community, governance, education, etc.

  11. Practice Self-Care and Healing: Recognize the personal and collective trauma that colonialism has inflicted and engage in practices of self-care and healing that are decolonial in nature.

  12. Engage in Community and Relationship Building: Decoloniality is often a communal, relational project. Engage in relationship-building within and across communities, recognizing the interconnectedness of all people and the planet.

These are broad strategies and they can take different forms depending on the context and the individual or group involved. It's important to approach this work with humility, openness, and a willingness to listen and learn.

Walter Mignolo, a prominent scholar in the field of decolonial studies, introduced the concept of "epistemic disobedience" as part of his broader critique of Western epistemology and modernity. Epistemic disobedience is a form of resistance against the Eurocentric modes of thought that have been imposed through colonialism and that continue to dominate global systems of knowledge, power, and being. Here's a more detailed look into Mignolo's concept of epistemic disobedience:

  1. Challenging Eurocentrism: Epistemic disobedience involves a critical questioning and challenging of Eurocentric knowledge and the assumption that European knowledge systems are the most advanced or legitimate ways of knowing. It seeks to expose and critique the Eurocentrism that is often implicit in dominant forms of knowledge.

  2. De-linking from Western Epistemology: A key aspect of epistemic disobedience is what Mignolo calls "de-linking," which involves a conscious uncoupling from Western epistemology and the intellectual categories that have been imposed by Western thought. This de-linking is an act of freedom and autonomy that allows for the possibility of thinking and being outside of the Western canon.

  3. Valuing Other Ways of Knowing: Epistemic disobedience involves not just a critique of Western knowledge but also a positive affirmation of other ways of knowing, particularly those of indigenous peoples and other cultures that have been marginalized by the West. It involves a recognition that these ways of knowing are not just different but also valuable in their own right.

  4. Critique of Modernity/Coloniality: For Mignolo, epistemic disobedience is tied to a broader critique of the modern/colonial world system. He argues that modernity itself is deeply entwined with colonialism (a concept often referred to as "coloniality") and that true decolonization requires a radical rethinking of the assumptions and structures of modernity.

  5. Decolonizing Thought: Epistemic disobedience is closely related to the project of "decolonizing thought," which involves reevaluating and restructuring the theories, methodologies, and assumptions of various academic disciplines to challenge their inherent colonial biases.

  6. Praxis and Liberation: For Mignolo, epistemic disobedience is not just an intellectual exercise; it is closely tied to political projects of liberation. It is a form of knowing that is oriented towards action and that seeks to contribute to the construction of a world that is more just and equitable.

  7. Resistance to Imperial Categories: Epistemic disobedience involves a rejection of categories and concepts that have been imposed by Western imperialism, and a search for concepts and categories that emerge from the experiences and perspectives of those who have been colonized.

  8. Border Thinking and Dwelling in the Borderlands: Mignolo also introduces the concept of "border thinking," which is a way of thinking from the perspective of the borderlands—those spaces where cultures meet and clash. This perspective allows for a vision that is not limited by the narrow confines of a single cultural or epistemic framework.

Epistemic disobedience, in Mignolo's formulation, is a potent form of intellectual and political resistance. It is a call for a profound transformation in the way that knowledge is produced, valued, and engaged with in the pursuit of a decolonial future.

"De-linking," as conceptualized by Walter Mignolo and other scholars in the field of decolonial studies, refers to a process of disengaging from Western-centric systems of knowledge, power, and cultural norms. It is a form of epistemic disobedience that aims to allow for the development and affirmation of alternative ways of knowing, being, and living. Here are some strategies for engaging in the process of de-linking:

  1. Critical Self-Reflection: Begin by examining your own assumptions, beliefs, and values. Ask yourself where these ideas come from and whose interests they serve. Reflect on how your own thinking might have been shaped by Western epistemological categories.

  2. Study Non-Western Epistemologies: Make a dedicated effort to study and engage with non-Western philosophies, worldviews, and ways of knowing. This could include indigenous knowledge systems, Eastern philosophies, African philosophies, etc.

  3. Challenge Binary Thinking: Western thought often relies on binary oppositions (e.g., civilized/barbaric, rational/irrational). Work to identify and move beyond these binary ways of thinking, and embrace more complex, nuanced perspectives.

  4. Read Widely and Diversely: Diversify your reading list to include authors from different parts of the world, especially those from historically marginalized and colonized regions. Prioritize voices that have been traditionally silenced or ignored.

  5. Question Authority and Canons: Critically engage with established authorities and canons in your field of study or profession. Ask why certain texts, authors, or perspectives are privileged and others are not, and advocate for a more diverse and inclusive approach.

  6. Engage in Dialogue: Actively engage in dialogue with people who have different perspectives and life experiences. Listen deeply and be willing to have your own views challenged.

  7. Practice Epistemic Humility: Acknowledge the limits of your own perspective and be open to learning from others. Understand that your way of knowing is just one among many and that you can learn from different epistemologies.

  8. Support Indigenous and Non-Western Communities: Learn from and support the struggles of indigenous and non-Western communities who are resisting Western domination and are working to maintain or recover their own ways of life and knowledge systems.

  9. Redefine Success and Well-being: Western epistemology often defines success in material terms (wealth, career status, etc.) and individual terms. Consider alternative definitions of success and well-being that are more communal, holistic, and sustainable.

  10. Decolonize Your Teaching/Work Practices: If you are in a position of influence or authority, such as a teacher or manager, critically examine how Western epistemology may be embedded in your teaching or work practices, and strive to create a more inclusive and decolonized environment.

  11. Engage in Political and Social Movements: Join or support political and social movements that are working toward decolonial and anti-imperial goals. This could include movements for indigenous rights, environmental justice, anti-racism, etc.

  12. Cultivate Personal Practices: Develop personal practices, such as meditation, spiritual practices, or art, that connect you with different ways of knowing and being, and that help you to internalize your process of de-linking.

"De-linking" in this context is not just an intellectual exercise; it is a deep and ongoing process that involves both critical thinking and emotional and spiritual engagement. It is a practice of liberation that aims to create space for more just, equitable, and diverse ways of living and thinking. It is important to approach this process with humility, sincerity, and a genuine openness to transformation.

bottom of page